More Criminal Minds
Sep. 14th, 2008 10:00 pmChildren of the Dark (304) pleased me quite a bit. We got to see a little more strength-to-cover-the-weakness.
The thing that really pleased me was Tyler. He reminds me of Nathan (Reid's troubled young man). Life is pretty much grooming both to be monsters, but they choose where they direct their destruction. Another for my growing list of storykinks.
And yay, Prentiss, wanting to ride to the rescue. (I've been reading
matociquala's treatises; I couldn't escape the Arthur even if I wanted to.) Everything about that, Hotch's concern, Emily's reply, JJ's input, was all so very well done. *pleased*
Seven Seconds (305) pleased me inordinately. We saw a little bit of rationality from the freaked out parents--panicked but able to be talked down from it. (On the other hand, I would've been sorely tempted to reply to "why is the FBI here, then?" with "you would rather we weren't?" but that wouldn't have helped in the least.)
The confrontation between Emily and the aunt was wonderful. (Dear aunt: victim blaming for the lose.) Go Emily! She's showing a real protective streak these days.
I was a little bit "meh" on the miracle ending though. Because of reading
matociquala, I got to thinking about time without oxygen to the brain. And then there's the part about the stats on CPR working (granted, they had more than that working for them). It seemed a bit like a pulled punch.
The thing that really pleased me was Tyler. He reminds me of Nathan (Reid's troubled young man). Life is pretty much grooming both to be monsters, but they choose where they direct their destruction. Another for my growing list of storykinks.
And yay, Prentiss, wanting to ride to the rescue. (I've been reading
Seven Seconds (305) pleased me inordinately. We saw a little bit of rationality from the freaked out parents--panicked but able to be talked down from it. (On the other hand, I would've been sorely tempted to reply to "why is the FBI here, then?" with "you would rather we weren't?" but that wouldn't have helped in the least.)
The confrontation between Emily and the aunt was wonderful. (Dear aunt: victim blaming for the lose.) Go Emily! She's showing a real protective streak these days.
I was a little bit "meh" on the miracle ending though. Because of reading
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 05:28 am (UTC)Outside of the hospital, if a bystander performs CPR, the chances of survival drop to a terrifying 4% to 6%, depending on method used (Cardiopulmonary @ 4% vs. Cardiocerebral at 6%.) Yes those numbers suck, but 4-6% is infinitely higher than the 1% of not performing CPR. That, BTW, assumes that CPR is continuous right through to arrival at the trauma centre.
And like me, you love your pets, so you'll be glad to know you can do CPR on them as well. The Wikipedia article I got those numbers from has a rather silly warning to not perform CPR on a dog or cat if it's awake as you run the risk of being bitten. If it's awake, I don't think it needs CPR.
(A couple of years ago my Uncle Claire coded in the Cardiac Care Ward at Sunnybrooke, resulting in an "heroic" code response. I do wish he was one of the 22%.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 12:05 pm (UTC)The ticker is a cranky old muscle sometimes. :-/
no subject
Date: 2008-09-15 10:59 pm (UTC)And on a related note, a defibrillator won't do much for somebody who has no heartbeat. Fibrillation is an irregular, spasming heart rhythm, and defibrillation has decent odds of shocking the silly muscle out of that... but if somebody's flatlined--without getting into crazy stuff like shots of stimulants straight into the heart muscles or something--he's dead, Jim.
My recent first aid instructor was full of such marvellous cheerfulness. He was also the one who told me that if you're doing CPR and you don't hear ribs snapping in the first couple of minutes, you're not doing it hard enough.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-16 12:14 am (UTC)